Historical China is a cultural information website with Chinese history as the core, providing ancient Chinese history, economy and culture, Chinese medicine health care, painting and calligraphy, antique, religious philosophy, etc.

Is Qin Shihuang an eternal emperor or a tyrant?

There are still many controversies about the life of the first Emperor Qin. Some say he is the one emperor who unified China and created the Chinese nation. Some said he burned books and pitifully, and that the fish and meat people were tyrants of the ages. There are different opinions on which is right or wrong, but we may be able to get the answer to the three words that Chairman Mao said.

From the people's Political Consultative Conference newspaper, December 21, 2006:

(1) The first emperor of Qin is an expert of a long history.

(2) Confucius and Mencius are idealism, Xunzi is materialism and Confucianism's "left school". Confucius represents slave owners and nobles. Xunzi represents the landlord class. In Chinese history, what really happened was the Emperor Qin Shihuang, who only spoke empty words.

(3) We should say a fair word. Qin Shihuang is much greater than Confucius, but he has been scolded for thousands of years

(4) Advise you to scold Qin Shihuang less and discuss the cause of burning pits. The soul of ZuLong died in Qin, and Kong Xueming was high and pitiful. The hundred dynasties were in line with the Qin government and law, and the ten batches were not good articles. He is familiar with the feudal theory of Tang Dynasty, and Mo conghou returns to the king of literature. The achievements of politicians of previous dynasties were Legalists in the early days of feudal society. These people advocate the rule of law, and they will kill the head if they violate the law, and they advocate that the past should be thin and old. Confucian people are full of benevolence and morality, and a whole lot of male and female prostitutes are advocating the old and the present.

(5) Qinshihuang is the first famous emperor in Chinese feudal society, and I am also Qinshihuang. LinBiao scolds me as Qinshihuang. China has always divided into two groups, one group is good about Qinshihuang and the other is about the bad of Qinshihuang. I approve of the first Emperor Qin and Confucius.

Chairman Mao's remarks, we can see from a detailed reading, are very objective and all facts. Since Qin Shihuang unified China, the car is the same track! The books are the same! The unified text! The unified measurement! The construction of Qin Zhidao! The construction of zhengguoqu! The establishment of the county system! Do not say that the words are the same, a county system is still in use, these are the facts of contribution, not the gorgeous words recorded by historians, even unlike some scholars full of benevolence and morality, a whole belly of male and female prostitutes, all advocate ancient times A hypocrite of today.

.

From the root, the image of the first emperor of Qin was damaged by the Confucians. The reason is that he has launched the events of "burning books" and "pitching Confucianism". This is a fatal blow to the intellectuals represented by Confucianism. It is the words of Confucianism that made the Emperor Qin a typical "tyrant". In the most image of today's metaphor, is the current network jet, keyboard man flow. No matter which dynasty, the skill of the emperor, the collection of military taxes is not to be thick and wrong.

Share: